Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:52
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do I sweat (mostly on face) when I eat usually spicy food?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Leprosy Was Lurking in The Americas Long Before Colonization, Study Finds - ScienceAlert
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How can you tell if someone is cunning?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
ChatGPT Tells User to Mix Bleach and Vinegar - Futurism
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
United Switches Off Starlink Internet on Regional Jets After Static Problem - WSJ
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.